FEMA Meets Obama’s FEMA Corps

November 3, 2012

What would be the difference between FEMA and FEMA Corps as displayed in this photo?

According to the AmeriCorps website: On March 13, 2012, the White House announced an innovative partnership between the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) to establish a FEMA-devoted unit of 1,600 service corps members within AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC) solely devoted to disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.

AmeriCorps is a signature program of Public Allies. President Obama was a member of the founding advisory board of Public Allies. First Lady Michelle was the founding Executive Director of Public Allies Chicago from Spring, 1993 until Fall, 1996, and served on the national board of directors from 1997 until 2001.

Obama’s AmeriCorps gives these jobs to high school dropouts with sweet benefits of childcare assistance, education award upon successful completion of service, housing, health coverage, living allowance, stipend, and training while the rest of America suffers with an 8% unemployment, a 50% unemployment rate for college grads, and veterans who can’t find jobs.

The job posting requires: An education level of less than high school completed

Age requirement: between 18 and 24 years of age

The program benefits/terms: Childcare assistance if eligible, Education award upon successful completion of service, Housing, Health Coverage, Living Allowance, Stipend, Training, Uniforms provided

As a reference point, Public Allies advertises the stipend it provides as $1,300 to $1,800 a month.

Guess who’s paying for this?

FEMA Corps job posting

 


Unemployment Under Obama — Over 8% Since First Full Month In Office

September 4, 2012

No. No. No. Don’t say unemployment has been forty plus straight months over 8% under Obama.

Do say …unemployment hasn’t gone below 8% since Obama’s first full month in office.

Obama's economy


Results of Obama Birth Certificate investigation announced by Sheriff Joe

March 3, 2012

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona

“Computer generated forgery” is suspect after a six month long investigation conducted by the Maricopa County Sheriffs’ Office in Arizona.

On March 1, 2012 an investigation on the authenticity of President Obamas’ Birth Certificate and other records were made public by the Sheriffs’ Office, which serves nearly four million residents in the fourth largest county in the United States.  Below is video evidence submitted in the press conference.

Preliminary findings were announced to the public personally by the infamous Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona.

The Sheriffs’ Office does not believe that the scanned document is of an original 1961 paper document as represented by the White House

Investigators advised Sheriff Arpaio that the forgers committed two crimes: first, in creating a fraudulent document which the White House characterized, knowingly or unknowingly, as an officially produced governmental birth record; and second, in fraudulently presenting that document to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

According to the U.S. Constitution, “No person except a natural born citizen…” shall be eligible for the Office of the President to assure allegiance by birth to our country. Residents of Maricopa County Arizona had petitioned the Sheriffs’ office to verify the birth certificate for eligibility before the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot is cast. The investigation was conducted by a team of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience coined the “Cold Case Posse” on a volunteer basis at no cost to the taxpayers.

After concluding probable cause to believe computer-generated forgery, investigators began examining other evidence of President Obama’s life history including:

President Obama’s Selective Service card is most likely also a forgery, revealed by an examination of the postal date stamp on the document;

To quell the popular idea that Obama was actually born outside the United States, the Sheriffs’ Office examined the Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards routinely filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights that originated outside the United States in the month of August 1961. Those records are housed at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. Interestingly,  records from the days surrounding Obama’s birth, August 1, 1961 to August 7, 1961 are missing. This is the only week in 1961 were these immigration cards cannot be found.

Click on the above video inset to view the entire press conference.


Barack Obama 2006 Debt Ceiling Speech in it’s entirety

July 16, 2011

In 2006 Barack Obama gave a speech in front of the Senate regarding the debt ceiling being raised during the George W. Bush administration. The entire transcript is posted to avoid any possible misrepresentation of his message. The visual aids are fabulous!

 

 


Obama Video – Hope and Change …the Obama Way

June 29, 2011

Progressive morality and the three classes

October 27, 2010

I remember those historic campaigns of “hope and change.” 

He’s forever changed our country by promoting progressive morality.

America is moving forward through progressive morality that overwhelmingly encourages the blame game, lying, cheating, getting in your neighbors face, acquiring things through devious means and normalizing an entitlement class.

We’ve been conditioned to believe there are three classes of Americans: rich, middle and poor.

With the transformation of America moving forward we now have three new classes of folks in this country:

The government class
The entitlement class
The victim class who aspire to better themselves through hard work and innovation who are forced to pay for the first two

I forgot the rule of survival: Every con game uses three ingredients against the target: Sell the dream. Push the greed button. Stress urgency.


Federal recovery funds — who’s getting the lions share

July 5, 2010

Whatever happened to the stimulus funds? Who benefited? Who didn’t? After compiling an extensive spreadsheet* it’s time to share it with you … from then to now. A state by state breakdown is at the end of this post.

Before Barack Obama was inaugurated to the most powerful office in the world on January 20, 2009 his cries of acting “swiftly and boldly” for passage of the stimulus bill were heard across the country. Declarations were made that the $787 stimulus bill would prevent millions of job losses from occurring.

A media frenzy ensued:
Nov. 24, 2008–(MSNBC) Obama calls for aggressive stimulus
Nov. 24, 2008–(NY Daily News) Obama to Congress: ‘Act quickly’ on stimulus package to create jobs
Dec. 3, 2008–(TimesArgus) Obama to governors: Help is coming quickly for states
Dec. 7, 2008–(Bloomberg) Obama says economy will worsen before recovery begins n
Jan. 27, 2009–(NY Daily News) GOP leaders tell rank and file to oppose Obama’s $825B bailout — even after concessions

Before taking office, Obama said the economic recovery was more important than the “enormous” federal budget deficit he would inherit “and that means that we can’t worry, short term, about the budget deficit.”

Since President Obama took office:
Within a month of the historic Presidential Inauguration, a $787 billion  American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) was signed into law on February 17, 2009 by President Barack Obama. In fact — the AARA was the 2nd stimulus package — the first was passed by President Bush a year earlier for $168 billion.

Sixteen months later unemployment has gone from 7.7% to 9.7% (Jan. 2009-May 2010) and the battle cry for another stimulus bill is being called for — even though the $787 billion ARRA funds have not been completely distributed.

Sixteen months later the public debt stands at $13.2 Trillion from the previous $10.6 Trillion debt of January 20, 2009 (Jan. 2009-July 2010). This debt represents figures in the HISTORY of our country. Eighteen months ago “we” had an accumulated debt of $10.6T in the HISTORY of our country. Within eighteen months, “our” debt has increased by about one third more. By contrast our public debt stood at $5.7T when President Bush took office in Jan. 2001. President Clinton did run a balanced budget but did not wipe out our debt —  rather than cut spending President Clinton generated monumental revenue by collecting future tax income during his administration through the Roth IRA conversion — a financial stunt President Obama is also offering — with some new carrots to entice the public. The public debt was nearly $4.2T when President Clinton took office in Jan. 1993.

Bank failures:
January-June  2010: 96
January-June 2009: 45
Total 2009 failures: 171

Home reposessions — May 2010 marked a record monthly high for the second month in a row of home reposessions. Up 1% from April and an increase of 44 percent from May 2009. All 50 states posted year-over-year foreclosure increases. Nevada, Arizona, Florida had the highest foreclosure (1 in 79 homes) notices in May 2010.

Some questions I had:
Did blue states make out better than red states like some theorists contend?

Did the ARRA achieve it’s goals of providing provisions for immediate federal tax cuts and incentives, an expansion of unemployment benefits and other social entitlement programs?

Did the 28 federal agencies who received recovery funds to finance contracts, grants, and loans around the country complete their task?

Statistics to date:
Note: While compiling the information off of the official government website set up specifically for “transparency” I noted repeatedly that information from one page to another was not consistent  (garbage in/garbage out theory may be in play). Further, the website has been adjusted since it’s inception making clear cut information harder to find and in my opinion, buried. Stimulus money was also sent off to Washington, DC which I noted separately. US territories, etc. consisting of American Samoa, Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Puerto Rico, US Minor Outlying Islands, US Virgin Islands and “Unassigned” items will be ignored …for now.

To keep it simple I’ve compiled information based on monies given to our 50 states unless noted and have rounded figures.

$195.6 Billion of the $787 Billion stimulus money has been allotted to our 50 states.

If, in a perfect world it was split 50 ways it would average $3.9B per state.

If every US resident pocketed an equal share the $195.6B it would split up to be approximately $636 for each person. (extracting out the loans)

One in 459 people in the US have benefited from “job creation.”

By comparison, $3.4 Billion has been rewarded to Washington, DC ($883.6M in contracts and $2.5B in grants).

$3.4 billion was awarded in the form of contracts and grants — no loans were made to Washington, DC.

One in 145 people in Washington, DC have benefited from “job creation.”

If the money funded to DC were equally distributed to each of its estimated 599,000+ residents they would each pocket about $5,670.

Other stimulus statistics
The most funding by dollar amount: California $22 billion

The least funding by dollar amount: Wyoming $538 million

State with biggest “piece of the pie” on a per resident basis of “free” money (grant and contract funds – less borrowed funds that have to be paid back): Alaska $2,419 per resident

State with smallest “piece of the pie” on a per resident basis of “free” money (grant and contract funds – less borrowed funds that have to be paid back): Florida $498 per resident

Jobs created across 50 states: 661,767 (13,235 avg. per state)

Average cost per job created: $295,600

Most jobs created: California 70,187 jobs

Least jobs created: Rhode Island 526 jobs

Highest job creation from fund dollars awarded (biggest bang for the buck): Illinois, $124,120 per job

Lowest job creation from fund dollars awarded (least bang for the buck): Rhode Island, $1,371,184 per job

Most jobs created per capita: Illinois, one in 199

Least jobs created per capita: Rhode Island, one in 1,994

By year end 2009 $174.7B was awarded and $53.8B of the $787B was received by recipients (including DC & territories)

January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 saw an additional $26.9B was awarded and $7.7 received by recipients.

Listings by state
The first figure below is how many residents within the state benefited from the $787 Billion stimulus through job creation.

Blue states voted for Obama while red states voted Republican.

The figure in ($  ) designates the amount of stimulus money divided by the number of jobs created [i.e. $200,000 in stimulus money created 2 jobs = ($100,000) ] as of March 31, 2010.

The final figure reflects the May 2010 Unemployment by %

**indicates states hit hardest by home foreclosures

***indicates states hit hardest by illegal immigrants

Alabama — 1 in 386 ($254,825) 10.8%
Alaska — 1 in 372 ($899,860) 8.3%
Arizona — 1 in 944 ($623,283) 9.6% ** – ***
Arkansas — 1 in 771 ($467,014) 7.7%
California — 1 in 523 ($314,562) 12.4% ** – ***
Colorado — 1 in 482 ($361,493) 8.0%
Connecticut — 1 in 456 ($244,371) 8.9%
Delaware — 1 in 644 ($524,031) 8.8%
Florida — 1 in 476 ($238,293) 11.7% ** – ***
Georgia — 1 in 305 ($169,190) 10.2%
Hawaii — 1 in 503 ($417,187) 6.6%
Idaho — 1 in 209 ($196,175) 9.0%
Illinois — 1 in 199 ($124,120) 10.8%
Indiana — 1 in 1,117 ($734,857) 10.0%
Iowa — 1 in 340 ($208,117) 6.8%
Kansas — 1 in 318 ($188,491) 6.5%
Kentucky — 1 in 252 ($150,356) 10.4%
Louisiana — 1 in 506 ($311,822) 6.9%
Maine — 1 in 761 ($532,603) 8.0%
Maryland — 1 in 837 ($645,233) 7.2%
Massachusetts — 1 in 556 ($441,153) 9.2%
Michigan — 1 in 678 ($488,157) 13.6%
Minnesota — 1 in 457 ($282,138) 7.0%
Mississippi — 1 in 422 ($313,903) 11.4%
Missouri — 1 in 335 ($213,048) 9.3%
Montana — 1 in 286 ($341,966) 7.2%
Nebraska — 1 in 484 ($300,576) 4.9%
Nevada — 1 in 545 ($311,501) 14.0% ** – ***
New Hampshire — 1 in 919 ($538,532) 6.4%
New Jersey — 1 in 450 ($261,390) 9.7%
New Mexico — 1 in 408 ($440,592) 8.4%
New York — 1 in 478 ($302,316) 8.3%
North Carolina — 1 in 376 ($211,435) 10.3%
North Dakota — 1 in 259 ($318,841) 3.6%
Ohio — 1 in 497 ($325,923) 10.7%
Oklahoma — 1 in 456 ($303,191) 6.7%
Oregon — 1 in 503 ($327,771) 10.6%
Pennsylvania — 1 in 606 ($353,022) 9.1%
Rhode Island — 1 in 1,994 ($1,371,184) 12.3%
South Carolina — 1 in 503 ($474,843) 11.0%
South Dakota — 1 in 330 ($406,914) 4.6%
Tennessee — 1 in 464 ($351,314) 10.4%
Texas — 1 in 559 ($301,490) 8.3% ***
Utah — 1 in 485 ($332,431) 7.3%
Vermont — 1 in 576 ($546,254) 6.2%
Virginia — 1 in 525 ($310,220) 7.1%
Washington — 1 in 452 ($410,146) 9.1%
West Virginia — 1 in 765 ($582,718) 8.9%
Wisconsin — 1 in 532 ($308,172) 8.2%
Wyoming — 1 in 833 ($841,839) 7.0%

District of Columbia — 1 in 145 ($823,363) 10.4%

NOTE: Twenty-eight different federal agencies have been allocated the $787 billion in recovery funds. Each agency chooses how to spend its funds.

The funds are split into three catagories:
$288B in tax benefits (56% has been awarded)
$275B in contracts, grants and loans (43% has been awarded)
$224B in entitlements (60% has been awarded)

*The spreadsheet is available for purchase.